HOME 記事一覧 未分類 The “Fault Lines” in the American Narrative: Reading Its Glory and Contradictions Through Two Maps
  • 2025年9月2日
  • 2025年9月5日

The “Fault Lines” in the American Narrative: Reading Its Glory and Contradictions Through Two Maps

The “Fault Lines” in the American Narrative: Reading Its Glory and Contradictions Through Two Maps

Introduction: We All Live by Stories

Human beings, whether we are conscious of it or not, are always living within some kind of “narrative.” From grand frameworks like religion and myth to family histories, personal memories, and even the worlds of films and games, multiple layers of narrative overlap to shape how we think and act.

Beneath those unfolding stories lies a foundation that is hard to move—demographics, resource constraints, economic structures, and legal institutions—the “ground of reality.”

This essay reads the United States through two overlaid lenses: the “map of narratives” and the “ledger of reality.” American history has alternated between eras when these two maps aligned and generated tremendous forward momentum, and eras when their mismatch formed “fault lines” that shook society. Grasping this dynamic is key to understanding contemporary America—and, by extension, the world.


Part I: A Double Lens—How to Treat Narrative and Reality

We deliberately switch between the following two perspectives.

The Map of Narratives (Structuralist Lens)

We analyze the “myths” and “dreams” repeatedly told in American society. In particular, we attend to simple binary oppositions—“freedom vs. tyranny,” “success vs. failure,” “good vs. evil”—and ask how they have moved hearts and oriented the nation in specific directions.

The Ledger of Reality (Realist Lens)

We examine objective data and material conditions—population, economy, industry, military power, and legal institutions. No matter how grand a narrative may be, it cannot escape the constraints of reality. Here we look squarely at the cold facts that support—or erode—those ideals.

Through these two lenses, we situate each era of American history in terms of how narrative and reality are related.


Part II: Historical “Fault Lines”—Four Eras in the Transformation of America’s Myths

American history is not a single, seamless story. It is the history of “fault lines,” like tectonic shifts in which the “narrative–reality package” is repeatedly replaced from one era to the next.

Fault Line ①: Founding to the Eve of the Civil War — “The Enlightenment Myth” vs. “The Reality of Slavery”

Map of Narratives 🗺️: A shining story of a nation of freedom and reason, distinct from the Old World of Europe—a “city upon a hill,” a polity built on the claim that “all men are created equal.”

Ledger of Reality 🧾: The economy of that ideal nation depended on the vast system of slavery that sustained the Southern plantations. National expansion also proceeded through the dispossession of Indigenous peoples.

Mismatch and Fault ⚡: For white men, the story of “freedom” and “equality” had real mobilizing power. Yet the fact that the story stood by excluding enslaved people and Indigenous peoples as fully human was a fundamental contradiction—one that ultimately tore the nation apart along a massive fault line called the Civil War.

Fault Line ②: Westward Expansion to the Gilded Age — “The Frontier Myth” vs. “The Reality of Monopoly Capitalism”

Map of Narratives 🗺️: The “frontier spirit” and “American Dream”—go west and, with enough effort, anyone can obtain land and success. Cast off the constraints of the East and achieve self-realization in the wilderness: a romantic tale.

Ledger of Reality 🧾: The transcontinental railroad was laid; in the East, giant monopoly capital (trusts) exemplified by Rockefeller came to dominate the economy. Cities spawned slums with harsh working conditions, while in the West Indigenous peoples were driven from their lands.

Mismatch and Fault ⚡: The frontier myth functioned brilliantly to divert attention from domestic inequality and labor problems and to channel national energy westward. But when the frontier was officially declared closed in 1890 and the concentration of wealth and poverty could no longer be hidden, the myth lost power. The Progressive Era arrived, demanding antitrust laws and labor reforms—the state began intervening in the unrestrained freedom of the individual.

Fault Line ③: New Deal to the Cold War — The Myth of “Leader of the Free World” vs. The Reality of a “Managed Society”

Map of Narratives 🗺️: A tale of “leader of the Free World” and “the world’s policeman,” guarding the globe against the “evil” of fascism and communism. The self-image of a just hero spreading freedom and democracy took root.

Ledger of Reality 🧾: At home, the New Deal greatly expanded the role of government. Under the Cold War, ideological policing exemplified by McCarthyism and the growth of a vast military-industrial complex strengthened the features of a “managed society.”

Mismatch and Fault ⚡: The presence of a clear enemy—“communism”—masked domestic contradictions and unified citizens as “guardians of freedom.” Yet the quagmire of the Vietnam War and the intensifying Civil Rights Movement exposed the deceptions within the tale of a nation of freedom and justice, shaking trust in the state along a major fault line.

Fault Line ④: Neoliberalism to the Present — The Myth of “Market Triumph” vs. The Reality of “Deep Polarization”

Map of Narratives 🗺️: After the Cold War, a narrative swept the world: “History has ended; liberal democracy and the market economy have achieved final victory.” Deregulation, globalization, and shareholder capitalism were treated as absolute goods; Silicon Valley’s IT revolution became their radiant emblem.

Ledger of Reality 🧾: Manufacturing moved overseas, producing the Rust Belt. The 2008 financial crisis laid bare the dangers of an unbridled market. Wealth concentrated in a small elite, and social media accelerated division and conflict.

Mismatch and Fault ⚡: This story gave America the feeling of being the sole superpower, but its benefits reached only a fraction of society. The frustrations of those left behind exploded with the election of Donald Trump in 2016. This symbolized the loss of the dominant narrative’s power to integrate the nation—arguably the greatest fault line in contemporary America.


Conclusion: The Never-Ending Work of Re-weaving the Narrative

American history is a cycle: powerful myths are erected to drive the nation forward, but contradictions with reality grow and eventually shatter those myths, confronting society with deep fault lines.

Standing upon those fault lines, Americans again struggle to re-weave a new story. The severe polarization that the United States faces today is evidence that we are in just such a “period of narrative re-composition.”

This double perspective—“narrative” and “reality”—is useful not only for America but also for understanding any country: Russia’s story of “great-power restoration,” China’s narrative of “revival from the century of humiliation,” and Japan’s narrative of the “peace state,” among others.

We must keep asking ourselves what story we are living—and what ground of reality we are standing on.